Former Maharashtra Chief Minister Prithviraj Chauhan has sparked a major political debate after claiming that India had effectively lost the war on the very first day of Operation Sindoor. His remarks relate to the May 7 aerial clash, which he said exposed serious weaknesses in India’s military response.
According to Chauhan, several Indian aircraft were shot down during the first day of the operation, after which the remaining fighter jets were grounded. He questioned the decision-making and preparedness behind the operation, asking whether maintaining a force of 1.2 million soldiers was justified if such outcomes occurred at the start of a conflict.
Chauhan made it clear that he stands by his statement and refused to apologize, despite strong criticism from political opponents and members of the ruling party. He said his comments were based on facts and were meant to raise serious questions about national security, not to undermine the armed forces.
His remarks have triggered sharp reactions across party lines. Critics accused him of damaging national morale and giving ammunition to rival narratives. Supporters, however, argued that questioning military strategy and accountability is part of democratic responsibility and should not be treated as anti-national.
The statement has also reopened discussions on military preparedness, transparency, and civilian oversight in defense matters. Analysts note that comments from senior political figures often influence public perception and can intensify already sensitive debates around national security.
As the controversy continues, Chauhan’s remarks remain a focal point in India’s political discourse, highlighting the tension between patriotism, accountability, and the right to question state decisions during times of conflict.
